New Approaches for Global Diplomacy: Justice, Diversity, and Interdependence

The recent diplomatic discussions between US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Vienna (May 11) mark a significant step towards improving relations between the two countries.

This dialogue signifies a departure from the hostile rhetoric that has characterized their debates in recent years, offering the promise of a more stable and effective international administration. The diplomatic balance between the United States and China is vital for global stability.

The Changing Landscape

Countries worldwide are consciously avoiding the pitfalls of previous rivalries and tensions. Today, the international community emphasizes pragmatic and practical investments in developing relationships with China and the United States.

This approach aims to avoid being trapped in an ideological choice reminiscent of the Cold War era.

Most countries skillfully manage their economic interests and employ hedging policies against potential risks related to the economy, the environment, and technology. This reality limits Washington’s ability to create sharp political polarization.

Strategic Independence

France’s Call for “Strategic Independence”: after a visit to China accompanied by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron called for “strategic independence” for Europe. He advocated for Europe to pursue an independent strategy regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that tension in the Taiwan Strait does not serve Europe’s interests.

Macron also expressed concerns about Europe’s increasing dependence on US arms, energy, and the dollar, highlighting the urgent need to strengthen European defense industries and reduce extraterritorial reliance on the US dollar.

These unprecedented French positions coincide with the European Union’s reassessment of its current policy towards China, viewing it through a complex lens of opponent, partner, and competitor. The Ukrainian-Russian conflict further complicates this relationship.

Balancing Interests

Countries in Southeast Asia demonstrate great confidence in managing balanced relationships amid the escalating competition between the United States and China.

They do so through bilateral relations with both countries and by developing effective multilateral institutions, such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

These nations leverage their attractive economic and financial indicators to navigate an era threatened by a global recession.

Africa’s Strategic Flexibility

African countries, like their European, Middle Eastern, and Indian counterparts, exhibit similar awareness of the need to maintain strategic flexibility between China and the United States.

They also resonate with Russia and China’s calls for a more equitable and inclusive international system. Burdened by the consequences of historical injustice and denied sustainable development policies, Africa is reluctant to choose sides.

The West’s credibility crisis, including its perceived unfair rules for the global system and inadequate response to financial, economic, and environmental crises, further reinforces this trend.

Building a New Approach

To address the challenges and forge a path toward international stability and cooperation, it is crucial to overcome the credibility crisis and build a new approach prioritizing justice, diversity, and interdependence.

It is essential to acknowledge the colonial legacy of the liberal West and recognize the historical responsibilities that come with it. Merely ideologizing climate issues for economic competition or mobilizing countries against China without considering historical contexts is insufficient.

A comprehensive approach should emphasize justice and fairness, considering the existing global historical imbalances.

Prioritizing Justice and Global Alliances

To achieve stability and prosperity, it is imperative to prioritize justice and foster stronger alliances and partnerships among nations. Climate change, economic inequalities, and geopolitical tensions require collective efforts and collaborative solutions.

Countries can build bridges and overcome traditional ideological divides by focusing on justice and fairness. This approach promotes inclusivity and ensures that all nations’ voices and needs are considered.

Inclusive Decision-Making

In this new era of international relations, it is crucial to move beyond binary choices and recognize the complexities of the modern world. Balancing competing interests while promoting shared goals is critical to navigating the changing power dynamics.

Decision-making processes should be more inclusive, allowing for a diverse range of nations to participate. By embracing diversity and interdependence, a more comprehensive and effective approach to global governance can be achieved.

The start of the Chinese-American dialogue in Vienna brings hope to those who believe that international stability is essential for widespread prosperity and well-being. By embracing a new approach to international relations, one based on justice, diversity, and interdependence, we can lay the foundation for a better world.

Overcoming the crisis of credibility and building stronger alliances and partnerships will be key to addressing the pressing challenges of our time.

By fostering dialogue, prioritizing justice, and acknowledging the changing dynamics of the global landscape, we can build bridges toward a stable, prosperous, and cooperative future for all nations.